When it comes to planting seeds, the planter has a verbal contract and more than a handshake, but the actual planting of the seeds. We have to individuals a farmer who owns the land, and a farmer who lonely has half a million seeds but no place to plant them. The two farmers come together, and they agree that the seed farmer and plant on the farmer’s land. Once the seeds are in the soil, the verbal contract is being implemented. The corp is to be shared equally. Halfway through the growth of the corp, the land farmer has a change of heart and destroys the corp. The land farmer is now in breach of contract even though it was a verbal agreement.

Having presented this argument, let us example the concept of a women’s right to an abortion. I will be using material from David Horowitz’s book Dark Agenda from page 105. Before choosing to have an abortion, a woman makes many other choices that radicals ignore. These choices are similar to the ones I used in the parable of the two farmers. The land farmer the female first chooses to have sex for the land to be seeded and the choice of which seed farmer she will permit the planting. Now there is the choice of planting seeds that will produce fruit, get pregnant, or remain barren with the use of some preventative means. If the decision is to bear fruit and the seed farmer plants seeds, the male provides sperm through planting intercourse the contract is now in place the land ower the female as agreed through her choice to be impregnated and willing for the production of fruit a baby.

At this point, the land farmer, the female as only rightfully two courses of action one to turn over the fruit of the harvest to the seed farmer, the male, you keep it jointly. To destroy the crop, the baby by abortion is in breach of a verbal agreement. Therefore the land farmer, the female, there should be no legal reason for her to be free of the responsibility for her previous contract agreement. Destroying of the harvest, the baby requires the consent of the seed farmer, the male, the father of the child. To abort the child without the father’s approval is a breach of the agreement, she entered when she made a choice to be seeded. Therefore, she is liable and must make restitution to the planter.