Tag Archive: Abortion


PASS

Another hidden truth that is not mentioned when people speak of Pro-Choice and Pro-Life is PASS. Post Abortion Stress Syndrome. The basic argument for Pro-Choice is that it is a woman’s body, and she has the right to choose. On the flip side, the fetus is not her body but another life and should be permitted to live. Some would suggest that females need to prevent pregnancy in the first place. However, what neither side is discussing is the after-effects of abortion. My quest is that Pro-Choice doesn’t want to discuss it because it would give the other side ammunition. The other side would suggest that women would not want to harm their bodies. Neither side states that abortion has adverse effects on a woman’s well-being. Most abortion centers don’t wish to overstate risks that stigmatize abortion, seek to intimidate women, and are unethical. However, not pointing to the possibility is just as dishonest.

What is Post Abortion Stress Syndrome? It is a conduction similar to post-traumatic stress disorder. Those who support the existence of PASS post-abortion syndrome have compared it to PTSD, suggesting it shares many of the same symptoms. The symptoms commonly associated with the post-abortion syndrome include tearfulness, mood changes, including anger, sadness, grief, or numbness, depression, guilt, regret, or denial of the abortion, flashbacks, nightmares, disrupted sleep, thoughts of suicide, substance use, relationship issues, decreased self-esteem, and fear of future pregnancy come with a warning label.

In a world where television broadcast drug commercials provide the positive and negative effects of the drugs, and if you have any symptoms, stop taking the medication and consult your physician. Since the Covid 19 pandemic, we are told to wear a mask for our protection and the protection of others. It would seem logical that women should receive suggestions to protect against unwanted pregnancy and the possible risk associated with abortion. The suggestion is to be wise and not foolish since the consequence of abortion could be a woman’s mental and physical health. 

When it comes to planting seeds, the planter has a verbal contract and more than a handshake, but the actual planting of the seeds. We have to individuals a farmer who owns the land, and a farmer who lonely has half a million seeds but no place to plant them. The two farmers come together, and they agree that the seed farmer and plant on the farmer’s land. Once the seeds are in the soil, the verbal contract is being implemented. The corp is to be shared equally. Halfway through the growth of the corp, the land farmer has a change of heart and destroys the corp. The land farmer is now in breach of contract even though it was a verbal agreement.

Having presented this argument, let us example the concept of a women’s right to an abortion. I will be using material from David Horowitz’s book Dark Agenda from page 105. Before choosing to have an abortion, a woman makes many other choices that radicals ignore. These choices are similar to the ones I used in the parable of the two farmers. The land farmer the female first chooses to have sex for the land to be seeded and the choice of which seed farmer she will permit the planting. Now there is the choice of planting seeds that will produce fruit, get pregnant, or remain barren with the use of some preventative means. If the decision is to bear fruit and the seed farmer plants seeds, the male provides sperm through planting intercourse the contract is now in place the land ower the female as agreed through her choice to be impregnated and willing for the production of fruit a baby.

At this point, the land farmer, the female as only rightfully two courses of action one to turn over the fruit of the harvest to the seed farmer, the male, you keep it jointly. To destroy the crop, the baby by abortion is in breach of a verbal agreement. Therefore the land farmer, the female, there should be no legal reason for her to be free of the responsibility for her previous contract agreement. Destroying of the harvest, the baby requires the consent of the seed farmer, the male, the father of the child. To abort the child without the father’s approval is a breach of the agreement, she entered when she made a choice to be seeded. Therefore, she is liable and must make restitution to the planter.